📋 Table of Contents

  1. Classification Rules
  2. Obligations
  3. Notified Body
  4. Battery Requirements
  5. Shelf-Life Requirements
  6. REACH
  7. RoHS
  8. Change Control Requirements
  9. OTC Requirements
  10. Export Certificates
  11. Transportation and Storage
  12. Waste Management
  13. AI Medical Device

1. Classification Rules

GREEN
Pursuant to Art. 2 para. 1 of the Medical Devices Ordinance (MepV, SR 812.213): "Medical devices are products, including software, that are intended by their manufacturer to be used in human beings for one or more of the following specific medical purposes: diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, prediction, prognosis, treatment or alleviation of disease; diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of, or compensation for, an injury or disability; investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological or pathological process or state; providing information by means of in vitro examination of specimens derived from the human body, including organ, blood and tissue donations; and which do not achieve their principal intended action by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means."

Classification is based on Annex VIII of MDR 2017/745 (EU), incorporated by reference via MepV Art. 15 into Swiss law. Devices are classified as Class I, Class IIa, Class IIb, or Class III based on intended purpose, risk, invasiveness, duration of use, and active principles. In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) devices are separately classified under IVDV (SR 812.219.18) referencing IVDR 2017/746 Annex VIII.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 2, Art. 15; Annex 1 (via MDR 2017/745 Annex VIII) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Federal Act on Medical Devices / Bundesgesetz über Medizinprodukte (MepG) SR 812.21 Art. 4–6 fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/552/en
EU MDR (incorporated by reference) 2017/745 Annex VIII (Classification Rules 1–22) eur-lex.europa.eu
  • Switzerland mirrors EU MDR 2017/745 classification rules — 22 classification rules covering non-invasive, invasive, active, and special rules (software, nanomaterials, etc.).
  • Manufacturers must apply classification rules prior to placing on market; ambiguous cases may be submitted to Swissmedic for a classification decision.
  • Class I devices (non-sterile, non-measuring): self-declaration (no Notified Body/NB required); sterile or measuring Class I: requires NB involvement for production aspects only.
  • Class IIa, IIb, III: mandatory conformity assessment by a Swissmedic-recognised NB or by a Swiss-recognised EU NB.
  • IVD devices classified separately under IVDV/IVDR (Class A, B, C, D) — Class C/D require NB assessment.
  • Manufacturers outside Switzerland must appoint a Swiss Authorised Representative (CHRep) registered with Swissmedic.
  • Switzerland adopted MepV on 26 May 2021 (entry into force), replacing the former MepV (SR 812.213, 2001 version) to align with EU MDR/IVDR.
  • Swissmedic provides a classification helpline and guidance documents downloadable from the Swissmedic portal (swissmedic.ch).
  • Transitional provisions: devices placed on the Swiss market under the old regime had grace periods to comply with new classification rules (most expired by 26 May 2024).
  • Border products (drug-device combinations, software) require careful boundary assessment; Swissmedic may issue determinations.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Classification framework fully aligned with EU MDR/IVDR via MepV. Comprehensive Swiss-specific guidance available from Swissmedic.

2. Obligations

GREEN
Pursuant to MepV (SR 812.213) Art. 5–14, economic operators — comprising manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers, and distributors — each bear defined obligations regarding the placing on the market, putting into service, and making available of medical devices in Switzerland. The manufacturer bears primary responsibility for ensuring that a device is designed and manufactured in accordance with the requirements of MepV and that the conformity assessment procedure has been carried out.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 5 (Manufacturers), Art. 9 (Authorised Representatives), Art. 10 (Importers), Art. 11 (Distributors), Art. 12–14 (registration obligations) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Federal Act on Medical Devices / Bundesgesetz über Medizinprodukte (MepG) SR 812.21 Art. 7–16 (obligations of economic operators) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/552/en
  • Manufacturers: Must draw up technical documentation, perform clinical evaluation, implement QMS (ISO 13485-compatible), carry out conformity assessment, affix CE marking (or CH-conformity mark for Swiss-only devices), issue a Declaration of Conformity, and register devices in EUDAMED (for EU) and the Swissmedic database.
  • Swiss Authorised Representative (CHRep): Mandatory for manufacturers established outside Switzerland. Must be registered with Swissmedic. Responsible for registration of device in Switzerland and for serving as contact for Swissmedic. Registration via Swissmedic eGov portal (ElViS).
  • Importers: Must verify device bears CE/conformity marking, is accompanied by required documentation, and is registered. Must maintain records and cooperate with Swissmedic on market surveillance.
  • Distributors: Must verify CE marking, labelling, and packaging before making available. Must inform manufacturers/importers and Swissmedic of devices suspected of non-compliance.
  • Post-Market Surveillance (PMS): Manufacturers must establish a PMS system, compile PMS reports (PMSR) or periodic safety update reports (PSUR) per device class.
  • Vigilance: Serious incidents must be reported to Swissmedic within defined timeframes (immediate: <24h for death/serious deterioration, 15 days for other serious incidents).
  • UDI: Unique Device Identifier assignment required; must be registered in EUDAMED (or Swiss equivalent when operational).
  • Switzerland introduced the CHRep requirement as a Switzerland-specific adaptation not present in EU MDR (which uses Authorised Representative for non-EU manufacturers). All non-Swiss manufacturers must appoint a CHRep before first placing on Swiss market.
  • Swissmedic uses the ElViS (Electronic Licensing and Vigilance System) portal for registration and notifications.
  • Mutual recognition agreement (MRA) between Switzerland and the EU was partially suspended as of 2021; Switzerland no longer automatically recognises EU NB decisions. This materially affects obligations for EU-manufactured devices targeting the Swiss market.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Obligations comprehensively defined in MepV and MepG. CHRep system is Switzerland-specific and clearly regulated.

3. Notified Body

AMBER
Under MepV Art. 2 para. 1 lit. h: a "conformity assessment body" (Konformitätsbewertungsstelle) is a body that performs third-party conformity assessment activities, including calibration, testing, certification and inspection. In the Swiss context, conformity assessment bodies for medical devices are designated and monitored by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) and notified to Swissmedic. These are the Swiss equivalent of "Notified Bodies" in the EU sense.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 20–27 (Conformity Assessment Bodies), Annex 5 fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Federal Act on Accreditation and Designation / Akkreditierungs- und Bezeichnungsgesetz (AkkBG) SR 946.51 Art. 4–16 fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2016/447/en
Therapeutic Products Act / Heilmittelgesetz (HMG) SR 812.21 Art. 45 (oversight of conformity assessment bodies) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/309/en
  • Conformity assessment bodies wishing to operate in Switzerland for medical devices must be accredited by SAS and designated by Swissmedic.
  • Due to the breakdown of the EU-Switzerland MRA (Mutual Recognition Agreement) in 2021, Swiss-designated conformity assessment bodies are not the same as EU Notified Bodies. EU NBs are not automatically recognised in Switzerland.
  • As of the report date, no Swiss-based conformity assessment body has been fully designated under the new MepV framework for Class IIa/IIb/III devices — a significant market access issue. Manufacturers targeting the Swiss market may need to obtain a separate Swiss certification or await resolution of the EU-CH MRA impasse.
  • For Class I devices (self-declaration), no NB is required; CE marking is accepted by Swissmedic on a transitional basis for certain device classes.
  • Requirements for designation: independence, competence (ISO/IEC 17065, 17020, 17025 as applicable), impartiality, financial stability, adequate personnel with demonstrated technical expertise per device product group.
  • The EU-Switzerland MRA suspension (effective 2021) is a critical gap: Swiss manufacturers cannot use EU NBs for Swiss market authorisation, and EU NBs cannot issue certificates valid for Switzerland without separate Swiss designation.
  • Swissmedic has published guidance that, during the interim period, it accepts CE-marked devices under transitional rules, but these provisions have sunset dates.
  • Negotiations between Switzerland and the EU on updating the MRA to include MDR/IVDR are ongoing but not yet concluded (as of 2026).
  • Manufacturers should monitor Swissmedic notifications (swissmedic.ch) for updates on NB designation and MRA status.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage Legal framework exists but operational implementation severely impacted by EU-CH MRA suspension. No fully designated Swiss NB for higher-class devices.

4. Battery Requirements

AMBER
Switzerland regulates batteries and accumulators primarily through the Ordinance on Batteries and Accumulators (BattV, SR 814.321). Under Art. 3 BattV: "Batteries and accumulators that are placed on the market must not exceed the limit values for certain hazardous substances (mercury, cadmium, lead) and must be marked with the appropriate symbols to allow consumers to separate them from other waste." For medical devices containing batteries, additional requirements arise from MepV's General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) — the device must be safe regardless of energy source, and power supplies must maintain device performance.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Ordinance on Batteries and Accumulators / Verordnung über Batterien und Akkumulatoren (BattV) SR 814.321 Art. 2–8 (substance restrictions), Art. 9–11 (labelling), Art. 12–19 (return/recycling) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2009/418/en
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 3 (GSPR), Annex 1 (via MDR 2017/745 Annex I, §13 — energy sources and power supply) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Chemicals Risk Reduction Ordinance / Chemikalien-Risikoreduktions-Verordnung (ORRChem/ChemRRV) SR 814.81 Annex 2.16 (cadmium/batteries), Annex 2.15 (mercury) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/387/en
  • Substance restrictions (BattV Art. 3): Batteries must not contain mercury >0.0005% by weight (except button cells ≤2% mercury by weight until further restriction) or cadmium >0.002% by weight (except portable batteries for power tools and emergency/alarm systems — exempted categories).
  • Labelling (BattV Art. 9–11): All batteries must be permanently marked with the crossed-out wheeled bin symbol (WEEE) and chemical symbols (Hg, Cd, Pb) if thresholds exceeded. Batteries with capacity >25 Wh must indicate capacity on label.
  • Medical device GSPR (MepV Annex 1 via MDR Annex I §13): Devices powered by batteries or external power supply must be designed to prevent risks from such sources; adequate information about battery type, installation, and replacement must accompany the device.
  • Take-back / recycling: Producers and importers of batteries must participate in a collection and recycling scheme (INOBAT or equivalent). Switzerland's BattV Art. 12–19 establishes mandatory return obligations.
  • Note: Switzerland has not yet fully transposed the new EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, which introduces carbon footprinting, battery passports, and supply chain due diligence. Swiss adaptation expected but not yet enacted.
  • There is no dedicated Swiss "medical device battery" regulation; requirements are split between BattV, ChemRRV, and MepV GSPR.
  • For implantable devices with integrated batteries (e.g., pacemakers), the MepV imposes specific biocompatibility and durability testing requirements for battery seals and enclosures under GSPR §10.
  • The EU's new Battery Regulation introducing a battery passport (planned 2026–2027) has not been adopted in Switzerland as of the report date — watch for Federal Council action.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage General battery law (BattV) well established. Medical-device-specific battery guidance is limited and the new EU Battery Regulation has not been transposed into Swiss law.

5. Shelf-Life Requirements

AMBER
Under MepV (SR 812.213) Art. 3 referencing MDR 2017/745 Annex I (GSPR) §23.2 lit. j: "The label shall include, where relevant, an indication of the date until which the device, or part of it, can be used safely, expressed as the year and month ('use by date')." Separately, GSPR §23.2 lit. p requires the indication of: "the date by which the device should be used safely, expressed at least in terms of year and month where applicable." The shelf life (also called expiry date or use-by date) is a manufacturer-declared parameter, validated through stability testing and incorporated into the technical documentation.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 3 (GSPR, via MDR 2017/745 Annex I §10, §23.2 lit. j/p) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
EU MDR (incorporated by reference) 2017/745 Annex I §10 (durability/ageing), §23.2 lit. j, p (labelling requirements) eur-lex.europa.eu
  • Manufacturers must declare and validate the shelf life for all devices where relevant — particularly sterile devices, single-use devices, devices with biological components, and devices with limited durability.
  • Shelf life must be determined through real-time ageing or accelerated ageing studies validated per ISO 11607-1 (for sterile packaging), ISO 10993-series (biocompatibility), and device-specific standards.
  • The use-by date must appear on the label in YYYY-MM format (ISO 8601); the use of the hour-glass symbol (ISO 15223-1) is mandatory to indicate expiry.
  • For sterile devices, shelf-life validation of the sterile barrier system (packaging integrity) is required and must be documented in technical files submitted for conformity assessment.
  • Devices that have exceeded their shelf life must not be placed on the market or made available to end users.
  • No separate Swiss shelf-life ordinance exists; requirements are entirely derived from MepV/MDR GSPRs and harmonised standards (ISO, EN).
  • Switzerland does not publish dedicated national guidance on shelf-life testing methods — manufacturers must rely on MDCG guidance documents (EU Medical Device Coordination Group) which are recognised by Swissmedic.
  • For reusable devices, the manufacturer must specify the number of reuses rather than a calendar expiry date, if applicable.
  • Shelf life claims may be re-examined during post-market surveillance if real-world data indicates premature device degradation.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage Requirements present via MDR GSPR incorporation into MepV, but no dedicated Swiss shelf-life guidance. Reliance on MDCG documents and harmonised standards.

6. REACH

GREEN
Switzerland has its own REACH-equivalent framework through the Chemicals Act (ChemG, SR 813.1) and Chemicals Ordinance (ChemV, SR 813.11). Art. 3 ChemG defines a "chemical substance" as a natural or artificial chemical element or compound in the natural state or obtained by any manufacturing process. The Chemicals Risk Reduction Ordinance (ChemRRV, SR 814.81) implements specific restriction measures. Additionally, for medical devices containing CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic, reprotoxic) substances, MepV Art. 3 referencing MDR Annex I §10.4 imposes explicit requirements: "Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce as far as possible the risks posed by substances or particles, including wear debris, degradation products and processing residues, that may be released from the device."
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Chemicals Act / Chemikaliengesetz (ChemG) SR 813.1 Art. 3 (definitions), Art. 5–8 (duties of manufacturers/suppliers) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2004/724/en
Chemicals Ordinance / Chemikalienverordnung (ChemV) SR 813.11 Art. 2 (substance notifications), Art. 16–20 (Safety Data Sheets) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2015/366/en
Chemicals Risk Reduction Ordinance / Chemikalien-Risikoreduktions-Verordnung (ChemRRV) SR 814.81 Annex 1 (prohibitions/restrictions), Annex 2 (conditions of use) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/387/en
Medical Devices Ordinance (chemical risk in devices) SR 812.213 Art. 3 GSPR (via MDR Annex I §10.4–10.6: CMR substances, endocrine disruptors, SVHCs) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
  • Swiss REACH-equivalent (ChemV/ChemRRV): Substances of very high concern (SVHCs) are restricted per ChemRRV Annex 1 and 2. The FOEN (BAFU) maintains the Swiss restricted substances list, closely mirroring the EU REACH SVHC Candidate List.
  • CMR substances in medical devices (MepV GSPR §10.4): Devices must not contain CMR category 1A or 1B substances in concentrations >0.1% w/w unless the manufacturer justifies that residual risk is outweighed by clinical benefit — documented with clinical evidence and risk-benefit analysis in the technical documentation.
  • Endocrine disruptors (GSPR §10.4.1): Devices containing endocrine-disrupting properties must carry additional labelling and the manufacturer must provide justification; in devices for children, pregnant/nursing women, specific restrictions apply.
  • SVHC notification to supply chain: Suppliers/manufacturers placing articles containing SVHC >0.1% w/w on the Swiss market must provide sufficient information to ensure safe use (per ChemV Art. 16 ff.).
  • Switzerland updates ChemRRV restrictions in parallel with EU REACH updates; the Federal Council issues amendments typically within 1–2 years of EU adoption.
  • Switzerland is not an EU Member State and does not directly apply EU REACH (1907/2006). However, Swiss ChemV/ChemRRV are structurally aligned and Switzerland participates in the OECD Cooperative Chemicals Assessment Programme.
  • Medical device manufacturers must check both EU REACH SVHC Candidate List AND Swiss ChemRRV Annex 1/2 to ensure dual compliance for devices marketed in both jurisdictions.
  • Safety Data Sheets (SDS) requirements in Switzerland follow the Globally Harmonised System (GHS) as implemented in ChemV Art. 16–20.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Swiss REACH-equivalent framework (ChemG/ChemV/ChemRRV) is comprehensive and well-aligned with EU REACH. Medical device-specific chemical restrictions in MepV GSPR are clear.

7. RoHS

GREEN
Switzerland implements RoHS-equivalent restrictions through the Ordinance on the Reduction of Risks from the Use of Certain Particularly Dangerous Substances and Products (ORRChem / ChemRRV, SR 814.81), specifically Annex 2.18 (restrictions on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment). This parallels the EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU. The restricted substances for EEE are: lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (Cr VI), polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP).
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Chemicals Risk Reduction Ordinance / Chemikalien-Risikoreduktions-Verordnung (ChemRRV) SR 814.81 Annex 2.18 (hazardous substances in EEE, mirroring EU RoHS); Art. 2 (scope) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/387/en
Federal Act on Environmental Protection / Umweltschutzgesetz (USG) SR 814.01 Art. 26–29 (restrictions on substances hazardous to the environment) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1984/1122_1122_1122/en
  • Scope (ChemRRV Annex 2.18): Applies to EEE placed on the Swiss market, including medical devices and monitoring/control instruments. Exemptions from the scope and from substance restrictions broadly mirror EU RoHS Annex III and IV exemptions.
  • Maximum concentration values (MCV): Pb, Hg, Cr VI, PBB, PBDE: ≤0.1% w/w per homogeneous material; Cd: ≤0.01% w/w per homogeneous material.
  • Medical device exemptions: Switzerland recognises RoHS-aligned exemptions for medical devices — e.g., lead in X-ray shielding, mercury in cold-cathode fluorescent lamps for special applications, lead solder in medical imaging equipment. Exemptions are periodically reviewed and updated.
  • Documentation: Manufacturers must maintain technical documentation demonstrating compliance with MCV or justifying the applicable exemption. No separate Swiss RoHS declaration is mandated — compliance is incorporated into the conformity declaration and technical file.
  • SVHC in EEE under ChemRRV: The four phthalates (DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP) added to EU RoHS via Directive 2015/863 have been incorporated into Swiss ChemRRV Annex 2.18 with threshold 0.1% w/w.
  • Switzerland updates ChemRRV Annex 2.18 in close alignment with EU RoHS amendments; however, there can be a 1–2 year lag between EU adoption and Swiss Federal Council implementation.
  • Unlike EU RoHS, Switzerland has not introduced a separate declaration of conformity specifically for RoHS — it is embedded in the product CE/CH marking process.
  • FOEN (BAFU) is the primary enforcement authority for ChemRRV; Swissmedic may also check RoHS-equivalent compliance during medical device market surveillance.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Swiss RoHS-equivalent (ChemRRV Annex 2.18) is comprehensive and aligned with EU RoHS 2011/65/EU including 2015/863 amendment. Medical device exemptions are mirrored.

8. Change Control Requirements

GREEN
Under MepV (SR 812.213), manufacturers must assess whether changes to a certified or declared-compliant medical device require re-assessment or notification. MepV Art. 5 para. 3 lit. c requires manufacturers to have in place a quality management system that includes change management procedures. GSPR changes assessment flows from MDR Art. 120 transitional provisions (incorporated via MepV). For devices bearing an NB certificate, significant changes to the design or intended purpose require the NB to assess and supplement or reissue the certificate. Swissmedic's guidance on changes refers to the Swissmedic guidance document "Changes to medical devices and their documentation" and aligns with EU MDCG 2020-3.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 5 (manufacturer QMS obligations including change procedures), Art. 20–27 (NB re-assessment), Annex 9 (via MDR Annex IX–XI: change assessment in certificate procedures) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Swiss Medical Devices Act / Heilmittelgesetz (HMG) SR 812.21 Art. 45–47 (post-market surveillance, incident reporting, change notifications) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/309/en
  • Significant change triggers full re-assessment: Changes to the intended purpose, design principles, manufacturing method, or materials that may affect safety/performance require NB re-assessment (or updated conformity assessment for Class I).
  • Non-significant changes: Must be documented in the technical file and QMS; notified to the NB (for certified devices) for review but do not require new certificate issuance if the NB concurs the change is non-significant.
  • Notification to Swissmedic: Certain changes require notification to Swissmedic via the ElViS portal, particularly changes affecting the device's registration data (name, intended purpose, UDI-DI).
  • MDCG 2020-3 guidance (adopted by Swissmedic): Provides decision flowchart distinguishing significant vs. non-significant changes based on potential impact on clinical evidence, conformity, and risk assessment.
  • For IVD devices under IVDV, equivalent requirements apply per IVDR Art. 57–58.
  • Changes arising from field safety corrective actions (FSCA) must follow Swissmedic's vigilance procedures simultaneously with change control documentation.
  • Swissmedic published guidance: "Guidance on handling changes to medical devices" referencing MDCG 2020-3. This is available in German, French, and English on the Swissmedic website.
  • The CHRep must ensure that Swissmedic is notified of device registration changes for non-Swiss manufacturers within 15 days of the change becoming effective.
  • Change control in the context of the QMS is audited during NB assessments under ISO 13485:2016 §8.3 (design and development changes).
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Change control requirements clearly defined via MepV/MDCG 2020-3 alignment. Swissmedic guidance documents available in multiple languages.

9. OTC Requirements

AMBER
In Switzerland, medical devices are generally available over-the-counter (OTC) without restriction unless specifically regulated otherwise. Unlike medicines, medical devices do not have a formal "prescription-only" classification system imposed by federal law. However, certain devices are subject to access restrictions under cantonal healthcare law, professional regulations, or specific MepV provisions. Swissmedic's role is product safety oversight, not sales channel regulation. The concept of "OTC medical devices" in Switzerland is therefore defined de facto by the absence of a prescription requirement rather than an explicit regulatory designation. Art. 65 of the Therapeutic Products Act (HMG) regulates advertising of medical devices to the general public.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Therapeutic Products Act / Heilmittelgesetz (HMG) SR 812.21 Art. 65 (advertising of medical devices), Art. 66–68 (prohibited advertising) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/309/en
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 3 GSPR (via MDR Annex I §23: labelling must include information on intended users — layperson or professional use) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Ordinance on Medical Devices Advertising / Arzneimittelwerbeverordnung (AWV) SR 812.212.5 Art. 18–23 (advertising of medical devices to the public and healthcare professionals) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2001/224/en
  • No federal prescription classification system for medical devices — Switzerland does not operate a "Rx vs. OTC" distinction for devices analogous to that for medicines. Any CE-marked or MepV-compliant device may be placed on sale.
  • Layperson vs. professional use labelling (MepV GSPR §23): The label and instructions for use must clearly indicate whether the device is intended for lay use or professional use only. Devices for lay use must provide instructions intelligible to a layperson.
  • Advertising restrictions (HMG Art. 65): Advertising of medical devices intended for professional use to the general public is prohibited. Advertising of devices for layperson use must not be misleading, must not promise diagnostic certainty or guaranteed cure, and must include product name, intended purpose, and any contraindications.
  • Certain devices restricted by profession: Cantonal regulations may restrict the use of specific devices (e.g., Class III implantable devices, radiation-emitting equipment) to licensed healthcare professionals or certified facilities, but this is not a federal OTC restriction per se.
  • Self-tests (IVD): Self-test IVDs (e.g., home pregnancy tests, blood glucose meters) are regulated separately under IVDV (SR 812.219.18). Manufacturers must specifically designate the device for self-testing; instructions for use must be written for laypersons.
  • The Swiss framework for OTC medical devices is less codified than for OTC medicines; there is no Swiss equivalent to the EU's list of devices restricted to professional use.
  • Swissmedic does not publish a positive list of OTC-permitted medical devices. Manufacturers must self-assess intended user population and design/label accordingly.
  • Some stakeholders have called for clearer OTC guidelines for direct-to-consumer diagnostic devices (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring, consumer wearables), but no specific regulatory action has been taken as of 2026.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage No dedicated OTC medical device classification system in Switzerland. Requirements inferred from MepV labelling and HMG advertising rules. Regulatory gap for direct-to-consumer digital/diagnostic devices.

10. Export Certificates

GREEN
Under MepV Art. 70 and the associated Swissmedic procedural guidelines, Swissmedic issues export certificates (also called Free Sale Certificates or Certificates of Free Sale) for medical devices manufactured in or distributed from Switzerland, at the request of the manufacturer or authorised representative. These certificates attest that the device is legally marketed in Switzerland and complies with Swiss regulatory requirements. They are used by importing countries that require such documentation for market access. Swissmedic also issues WHO-format certificates where requested.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 70 (export certificates); Art. 71 (devices for export only) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Swiss Therapeutic Products Act / Heilmittelgesetz (HMG) SR 812.21 Art. 20 (export of therapeutic products) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/309/en
  • Eligibility: Export certificates are issued for devices that are legally placed on the Swiss market (CE/CH mark, registered with Swissmedic) OR for devices manufactured in Switzerland exclusively for export (MepV Art. 71 — export-only devices are exempt from conformity assessment requirements but must comply with general safety requirements).
  • Application process: Apply via Swissmedic eGov portal (ElViS). Required documents: copy of Declaration of Conformity (for devices marketed in CH), technical summary, device description. For export-only devices: manufacturer attestation of compliance with destination country requirements.
  • Certificate format: Swissmedic issues:
    • Standard Free Sale Certificate (FSC) — lists device, manufacturer, compliance with Swiss law
    • WHO-format Certificate (on request) — for countries requiring WHO Certificate for National Health Regulatory Authorities format
    • Country-specific formats where required (e.g., some national health authority templates)
  • Fees: Swissmedic charges a fee per certificate. Current fee schedule published in the Swissmedic Fee Ordinance (GebV-HMG, SR 812.214.5).
  • Validity: Export certificates are typically valid for 1–3 years; the importing country may impose shorter validity requirements.
  • Processing time: Standard processing 10–15 working days; expedited processing available for additional fee.
  • Switzerland is a member of IMDRF (International Medical Device Regulators Forum) and its export certificate framework is aligned with IMDRF principles.
  • Export certificates do not confer market authorisation in the destination country — they are evidentiary documents for foreign regulators.
  • For devices exported to countries with bilateral recognition agreements with Switzerland (currently limited due to EU MRA suspension), certificate requirements may differ.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Export certificate process clearly defined in MepV Art. 70–71. Swissmedic operates a functional eGov application system. WHO and FSC formats available.

11. Transportation and Storage

AMBER
Under MepV Art. 3 (GSPR via MDR Annex I §23.2 lit. l and §10): manufacturers must ensure that devices "can be transported and stored safely" under the conditions specified by the manufacturer. The label and/or instructions for use must indicate the storage and transport conditions (temperature range, humidity, pressure, light, vibration limits) necessary to maintain device safety and performance. Additionally, for temperature-sensitive devices (e.g., cold-chain biologicals, IVDs), specific cold-chain transport and storage validation is required. Swiss law does not have a standalone transport/storage ordinance for medical devices; requirements are embedded in MepV GSPR and Good Distribution Practice guidelines.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 3 GSPR (via MDR Annex I §10.4 — durability, §23.2 lit. k/l — storage and transport conditions on label) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
Ordinance on Good Distribution Practice for Medical Devices (if applicable) — (guidance document) Swissmedic GDP Guidance for medical devices — distribution conditions, temperature monitoring, handling swissmedic.ch
Road Transport of Dangerous Goods Ordinance / SDR (Strassentransport gefährlicher Güter) SR 741.621 Applies to transport of radioactive, biological, or chemically classified medical devices as dangerous goods per ADR/SDR classifications fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2002/565/en
  • Labelling (MepV GSPR §23.2 lit. k/l): Labels must include storage conditions (temperature, humidity, light) and transport conditions where compliance is necessary to maintain device safety/performance.
  • ISO 15223-1 symbols: Standardised symbols for temperature limits (e.g., snowflake for "keep below X°C", thermometer for temperature range) must be used on device packaging per ISO 15223-1:2021.
  • Cold-chain devices: Manufacturers of temperature-sensitive devices must validate that the supply chain maintains required conditions; this includes qualification of packaging, transport containers, monitoring devices, and carrier agreements.
  • Dangerous goods: Medical devices classified as dangerous goods (e.g., devices with radioactive components, flammable solvents, biological material) must comply with ADR/SDR (road), IATA DGR (air), and IMDG (sea) — as transposed into Swiss law via SDR and relevant aviation regulations.
  • Good Distribution Practice (GDP): Distributors are expected to follow Swissmedic GDP guidance for medical devices, covering warehousing conditions, stock rotation (FIFO), temperature monitoring, and transport documentation.
  • Switzerland has not enacted a dedicated Medical Device GDP Ordinance; GDP requirements are Swissmedic guidance documents (not legally binding by themselves but expected by inspectors).
  • For cold-chain biologics used as part of combination medical device-drug products, the Medicinal Products Licensing Ordinance (AMBV, SR 812.212.1) and its GDP provisions may also apply.
  • In practice, Swiss cantonal authorities enforce pharmaceutical GDP requirements which are used by analogy for medical devices.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage Labelling requirements for transport/storage are clear in MepV. However, no dedicated GDP Ordinance for medical devices. Cold-chain and dangerous goods requirements come from separate regulatory domains.

12. Waste Management

GREEN
Switzerland regulates disposal of electrical and electronic equipment (including applicable medical devices) through the Ordinance on the Return, Taking Back and Disposal of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (VREG, SR 814.620). Art. 2 VREG defines "electrical and electronic equipment" as apparatus that are dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields to function properly. Art. 3 establishes a producer responsibility system: producers and importers must take back and ensure environmentally sound disposal of EEE placed on the Swiss market. For clinical/healthcare waste containing medical devices (single-use, biological contamination), cantonal hospital waste regulations and the Ordinance on the Movement of Waste (VeVA, SR 814.610) apply.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Ordinance on Return, Taking Back and Disposal of EEE / Verordnung über die Rückgabe, die Rücknahme und die Entsorgung elektrischer und elektronischer Geräte (VREG) SR 814.620 Art. 2 (definitions), Art. 3–5 (producer take-back obligations), Art. 6–10 (collection systems, SENS/SWICO/SLRS) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/395/en
Ordinance on the Movement of Waste / Verordnung über den Verkehr mit Abfällen (VeVA) SR 814.610 Art. 2–5 (hazardous waste definitions), Art. 12–18 (transport, manifests for hazardous waste including clinical/biological waste) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/747/en
Federal Act on Environmental Protection / Umweltschutzgesetz (USG) SR 814.01 Art. 30–32 (waste management principles: avoidance, reduction, recycling, safe disposal) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1984/1122_1122_1122/en
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 3 GSPR (via MDR Annex I §23.2 lit. m — disposal information to be included in IFU) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
  • VREG (EEE take-back): Producers and importers of electronic medical devices must participate in an approved collective take-back system (SENS eRecycling, SWICO Recycling, or SLRS). Must register with a system and pay advance recycling fees (vorgezogene Recyclinggebühr, VRG) collected at point of sale.
  • IFU disposal information (MepV GSPR §23.2 lit. m): Instructions for use must include information on decontamination, sterilisation and disposal procedures, as applicable. For single-use devices, prohibition on re-use must be clearly indicated (crossed-out "2" symbol, ISO 7000-1051).
  • Clinical/biological waste (VeVA): Devices contaminated with biological material (blood, tissue) constitute special waste — must be collected, packaged, labelled, transported, and disposed of by licensed waste management companies. Manifests (Begleitschein) required for transport of quantities above thresholds.
  • Sharps waste: Needles, lancets, and sharp devices — cantonal regulations govern disposal containers and collection points; typically channelled to incineration.
  • Implant removal: Removed implants (e.g., joint replacements, pacemakers) are classified as clinical/hospital waste; disposal follows cantonal healthcare waste regulations and VeVA.
  • The Swiss WEEE system (VREG) predates and differs from the EU WEEE Directive in scope and fee structure, but achieves similar collection and recycling goals.
  • FOEN (BAFU) oversees VREG compliance; enforcement is cantonally distributed.
  • Switzerland does not currently have specific rules on the disposal of AI-embedded or software-containing medical devices beyond general EEE take-back rules — a potential future gap as connected devices proliferate.
Gap Status: GREEN — Well Documented Comprehensive framework: VREG for EEE take-back, VeVA for clinical waste, USG for general waste management principles. MepV requires disposal info in IFU. Well-enforced in practice.

13. AI Medical Device

AMBER
Under MepV (SR 812.213) Art. 2 and the GSPR (via MDR 2017/745 Annex I §17): "Software" intended by its manufacturer for one or more of the medical purposes set out in the definition of a medical device in Art. 2(1) MDR constitutes a medical device in its own right (standalone software/SaMD — Software as a Medical Device). Software incorporating artificial intelligence or machine learning algorithms intended for medical purposes — e.g., AI-based diagnostic decision support, AI image analysis, predictive analytics for patient outcomes — falls within the scope of MepV and is classified using the same classification rules (MDR Annex VIII, Classification Rule 11 for active devices with diagnostic function, and the MDCG 2019-11 guidance on qualification and classification of software). Swissmedic has confirmed it applies MDCG 2019-11 and MDCG 2021-24 (SaMD/AI specific guidance) to assess AI-based medical devices.
Law Name (EN / DE)SR NumberArticlesSource URL
Medical Devices Ordinance / Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) SR 812.213 Art. 2 (definition including software); Art. 3 GSPR (via MDR Annex I §17 — software development lifecycle, cybersecurity); Annex VIII Rule 11 (classification of software) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/553/en
EU AI Act (reference — not yet transposed into Swiss law) EU 2024/1689 Art. 6 (high-risk AI systems including AI in medical devices), Annex III (list of high-risk AI applications) eur-lex.europa.eu
Federal Act on Data Protection / Datenschutzgesetz (DSG) SR 235.1 Art. 5, 12, 21 (profiling, automated individual decisions, rights of data subjects — relevant to AI-driven medical decision support) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2022/491/en
  • Qualification: AI/ML software must be assessed for qualification as a medical device using MDCG 2019-11 criteria: Does it perform an action on data beyond display/storage? Is it intended for medical purposes? If yes — it qualifies as SaMD and is subject to MepV.
  • Classification (AI SaMD): Under MDR Rule 11 (applied via MepV Annex): AI software intended for diagnosis or therapy of life-threatening conditions or allowing clinical decisions with significant impact on patient management → Class IIa or higher. Software providing information used to make decisions in immediately life-threatening situations → Class III. Most AI diagnostic support software → at least Class IIa requiring NB involvement.
  • GSPR §17 (Software development lifecycle): AI systems must be developed following a documented software development lifecycle (IEC 62304), with risk management (ISO 14971), and must be validated against the intended use. AI-specific requirements include:
    • Documentation of training data, validation datasets, algorithm version control
    • Assessment of bias in training data and performance across patient subpopulations
    • Transparency of AI decision logic (explainability requirements)
    • Post-deployment monitoring plan for algorithm performance drift (PMS)
  • Cybersecurity (MepV GSPR via MDR Annex I §17.2): AI-enabled devices must incorporate appropriate cybersecurity measures including secure update mechanisms, protection against unauthorised access, and integrity verification of AI models.
  • Data protection (DSG): AI medical devices processing personal health data must comply with the revised Swiss DSG (in force 1 September 2023), including lawful basis for processing, data minimisation, and individual rights regarding automated decisions.
  • Adaptive/continuously-learning algorithms: MDCG 2021-24 guidance (applied by Swissmedic) addresses AI systems that learn continuously post-market — these require additional controls including predefined performance boundaries and change control procedures for algorithm updates.
  • Switzerland has not enacted an AI Act equivalent to EU Regulation 2024/1689. The Federal Council has published discussion papers on AI governance but no binding AI-specific medical device legislation exists as of 2026. Regulatory oversight relies entirely on MepV/SaMD framework.
  • The EU AI Act, which classifies AI in medical devices as high-risk (Annex III), entered into force in August 2024 with phased implementation. Switzerland is not bound by the EU AI Act but is monitoring developments — potential future alignment via bilateral agreement.
  • Swissmedic has designated internal expertise for SaMD/AI device reviews and collaborates with IMDRF working group on Software as a Medical Device (IMDRF SaMD Technical Documents).
  • Manufacturers of AI medical devices targeting both Swiss and EU markets must navigate: (a) MepV SaMD classification and NB certification (with the caveat of the MRA issue); (b) EU MDR/AI Act dual compliance for the EU market.
  • The Swiss revised DSG (September 2023) includes provisions on automated individual decisions (Art. 21) that may be triggered by AI diagnostic recommendations — manufacturers should review patient rights disclosures.
Gap Status: AMBER — Partial Coverage SaMD/AI medical device regulated under MepV via MDR framework (MDCG 2019-11/2021-24 applied). No Swiss AI Act. EU AI Act not transposed. Algorithm-specific and continuously-learning AI guidance gaps remain.

Summary — Gap Status Overview

# Tile Primary Law (SR) Gap Status Key Issue
1Classification RulesMepV SR 812.213 / MDR 2017/745GREENFully aligned with EU MDR classification framework
2ObligationsMepV SR 812.213 / MepG SR 812.21GREENCHRep system and full economic operator obligations defined
3Notified BodyMepV SR 812.213 / AkkBG SR 946.51AMBEREU-CH MRA suspended; no fully designated Swiss NB for Class IIa+ devices
4Battery RequirementsBattV SR 814.321 / ChemRRV SR 814.81AMBERNew EU Battery Regulation not yet transposed; no medical-device-specific battery guidance
5Shelf-Life RequirementsMepV SR 812.213 (via MDR Annex I)AMBERRequirements embedded in GSPRs only; no dedicated Swiss shelf-life guidance
6REACHChemG SR 813.1 / ChemV SR 813.11 / ChemRRV SR 814.81GREENSwiss REACH-equivalent comprehensive and well-aligned with EU REACH
7RoHSChemRRV SR 814.81 Annex 2.18GREENComprehensive Swiss RoHS-equivalent; medical device exemptions mirrored
8Change ControlMepV SR 812.213 / MDCG 2020-3GREENClear framework via MepV + MDCG guidance adopted by Swissmedic
9OTC RequirementsHMG SR 812.21 / AWV SR 812.212.5AMBERNo formal OTC classification for devices; gaps for direct-to-consumer diagnostics
10Export CertificatesMepV SR 812.213 Art. 70–71GREENWell-defined process; FSC and WHO formats available via ElViS portal
11Transportation and StorageMepV SR 812.213 / SDR SR 741.621AMBERNo dedicated GDP Ordinance; labelling requirements clear but operational GDP is guidance only
12Waste ManagementVREG SR 814.620 / VeVA SR 814.610GREENComprehensive WEEE take-back and clinical waste framework
13AI Medical DeviceMepV SR 812.213 / DSG SR 235.1AMBERNo Swiss AI Act; reliance on MDCG guidance; EU AI Act not transposed
GREEN: 7 tiles AMBER: 6 tiles RED: 0 tiles